| Issue #49, March 16, 2007 |
THE STATE MAY SPLIT CIGARETTE TAXES WITH INDIANS

By Sabrina C. Mashburn
Since New York instigated its
tax-driven war on cigarettes in 1999, New York lawmakers have been
intent on ensuring that all New York smokers pay that tax, no matter
where they choose to buy their cigarettes. Even those who buy their
cigarettes on line are subject to taxation and frequently receive
bills from the State for the taxes they did not pay. Other states
followed suit, and began demanding that smokers who bought their
cigarettes from out of state retailers pay the taxes. In Washington,
Seattle resident Scott Adams received an $8,000 bill for back taxes
on cartons of cigarettes purchased out of state. However, there
was a way to get around all of those taxes — buying cigarettes
at nearby Native American reservation smoke shops.
Beginning in 1999, hundreds of jobs
were created as cigarette sales plummeted in local convenience stores
and soared in reservations, where smokers could buy the same brands,
tax-free. Currently, Native Americans are not required to pay taxes
on the wholesale cartons they purchase. However, in 2003, Governor
George Pataki was urged by the NY State Association of Convenience
Stores and other cigarette dealers who blamed their plummeting sales
not on the new taxes, but on the Native Americans whose cigarette
sales, soared after the implementation of the tax. The Governor
decided that he would require Native Americans to pay taxes to the
cigarette manufacturers only on cartons allotted for sale to non-Native
American smokers.
Each establishment would be allowed
to purchase a certain number of tax-free cartons with special stamps
for sale only to Native Americans. All other cartons would be taxed
as they would at any other establishment. Although other states
such as Arizona had implemented similar plans, the Governor’s
plan was met with such dissent from both the smoking community and
New York’s Native American community that he decided to extend
the decision deadline until it fell beyond the end of his term.
During his campaign, Governor Elliott Spitzer supported the plan,
winning the support of convenience and grocery store owners and
employees statewide. In response, the Seneca Nation launched a vigorous
advertising campaign, accusing New York of trying to break a centuries-old
treaty to steal hundreds of Native jobs. They even threatened to
purchase cigarette wholesaler A.D. Bedell & Co. in order to
avoid paying the tax. But tribes with fewer resources than the casino-bolstered
Seneca, such as the Shinnecock, would have no way to avoid the new
tax and many Native Americans feared that hundreds of jobs would
be lost when their cigarettes were the same price as those sold
at every convenience store across the nation. Those jobs, stores
such as Gristedes, argued, were created in 1999 as a reaction to
the taxes non-Native stores were forced to charge and that they
rightfully belonged to those who had the jobs before the tax was
implemented. Gristedes even threatened to sue Long Island tribal
officials and the tribes themselves for taking tobacco business
away from the local branches of the chain.
Last week, Democratic Senator Jeff
Klein submitted a 28-page report detailing an even more radical
plan to combat the discrepancy. The Senator, who is based in Westchester,
points to the fact that although cigarette taxes have steadily increased
since 2002, revenues from cigarette sales have plummeted. He suggests
that reservation smoke shops are to blame for the lost revenue,
and he thinks that the only way to level the playing field is to
offer Native American tribes a potentially lucrative deal. Instead
of forcing Native Americans to pay taxes directly to cigarette manufacturers
and then pass those taxes on to their clients, Klein believes that
Native Americans should still be able to purchase tax-free cigarettes.
However, packs sold to non-Native Americans would be subject to
the same state tax as cigarettes sold off the reservation. Instead
of the state collecting the entire tax, the state would split the
tax with the tribe 50/50, although powerful tribes such as the Seneca
probably would not benefit from this deal, as they have built their
business around selling cigarettes at drastically reduced prices
and are financially secure. For less powerful tribes such as the
Shinnecock, this deal might mean the difference between having the
funds to go forward with even more lucrative projects and staying
in the same situation they are in right now.
If the tax were equal to the regular
state tax, however, reservation outposts that are less convenient
to drive to than the corner gas station could become obsolete. So
far, Senator Klein has plans to introduce State legislation to try
to get his proposal moving. With the support of Governor Spitzer,
there is a chance this proposal could become a law in the near future.
What this will mean to local Native American tribal economies is
unknown as of yet, but it can’t be good.
|
|