| Issue #46, February 23, 2007 |
THE 1ST AMENDMENT AND THE RIGHT TO WRITE

By Dan Rattiner
A whistle-blower who worked
as a volunteer in a Southampton Town Animal Shelter three years
ago, won a lawsuit against the town for $251,000 on Friday.
Pat Lynch, a former writer and producer
for the “NBC Nightly News” and an Emmy award winner,
now semi-retired in Sag Harbor, sued the town after being humiliated
and abused by town employees at the shelter after writing letters
to local newspapers about bad conditions there.
It’s a landmark lawsuit. If
it stands up — and the Town could appeal — it will extend
First Amendment rights not only to employees of public and private
enterprises who see what they think are bad things going on and
report them, but also to volunteers who have been previously invited
in to help out. These rights are to be offered when a judge and
jury determine that the issue at stake is “a matter of public
concern.”
In the case of the animal shelter,
Lynch was told, after writing her critical letters, that she was
to leave the premises immediately, cease her volunteer work and
never come back. At a six-day jury trial in Islip, it was shown
that she was actually escorted off the premises by three uniformed
police officers. In spite of the decision, the ban on her presence
at the shelter continues in effect. She was awarded the sum of money
for pain and suffering.
Pat Lynch volunteered, as many others
did, back in 2004, to walk the dogs. There was room for 24 stray
dogs at the town kennel and they were kept there, according to the
brochure that was printed up asking for private donations, at a
“no-kill” facility. This could be breached for dogs
too wild to be trained or too sick to be rehabilitated, as determined
by veterinarians.
Lynch observed, and wrote in her
columns, that the dogs were often euthanized for very slight provocation
and often not with the required approval from a veterinarian. The
kennels were unheated, with broken windows, and the animals were
often kept in filthy circumstances, or sometimes in isolation for
as long as seven days without being taken out for a walk. They often
became desperate and then began a self-fulfilling prophecy of being
unable to be rehabilitated and thus candidates for euthanasia.
She said that no home checks or vet
checks were done by the receptionist who was supposed to do them
when she was there, so sometimes a dog that hated children could
be placed with children. She gave examples. She said the animal
control officers would not offer to walk the animals when they were
not doing anything else, saying it was not in their job description.
She said all these things were a matter of public concern. A judge
and jury agreed with her.
The fact is, shortly after she left
the Quogue shelter, it was closed down and a larger facility for
40 strays was built in the Red Creek section of Hampton Bays nearer
to the Town Campus where people could keep an eye on it better.
Pat Lynch says that the situation today, under the close supervision
of management and budget head Richard Blowes, is much improved.
|