| Issue #43, February 2, 2007 |
SOUTHAMPTON CONSIDERS EVENT PERMIT CHANGES

By David Stoll
Every summer, thousands of
weekend visitors and residents alike, attend their favorite charitable
events, hoping to be pictured the following week in Dan’s
Papers. During some weekends, there are literally dozens of events,
most of them outside on a lawn, under a big tent. While we do-gooding
partygoers take these events for granted, shelling out cash, being
watched, and (if we merit it) photographed, most of these events
take place thanks to the granting of a permit by the relevant town
or village. The rules for obtaining such permits in the Town of
Southampton may change soon and some charities are worried.
Last week, the Town Board of Southampton
held its third discussion concerning new rules. According to Councilwoman
Nancy Graboski, who proposed the change, the purpose of the new
rules is to simplify and clarify the application process by increasing
the amount of time between the required application date and the
event. Today, the Town Clerk’s office often finds itself inundated
with applications in May and June that must be processed for events
scheduled in July and August.
Under the Southampton Town Code today,
a permit is required for a Special Event – even if the event
is held on private property. A Special Event is an event held outdoors
and attended by more than 150 people. An event lasting less than
90 minutes (even if attended by more than 150 people) is not considered
a Special Event, unless there are more than 500 people and the event
extends beyond 7:30 at night. Since few summer events last less
than 90 minutes and many are attended by far more than 150 people,
most Special Events do require a permit.
To obtain a permit for a special
event under current law, an application must be filed at least 40
days before the event, and the Town Clerk’s office advises
applicants to write a letter in advance of that time indicating
that an application is on the way. The application must contain
detailed information about the property, size of the event, parking,
trash disposal, food, etc, as well as proof of a comprehensive insurance
policy naming the event planner and the Town itself as beneficiaries.
For events with attendance of more than 1,000 people or that otherwise
might affect health and safety, the Town is allowed to require,
as a condition of the permit, that the event planner pay the Town
for the traffic police.
The permit application is reviewed
by the Chief of Police, the Fire Marshall and the Town Board. After
receiving a report from the Police Chief and Fire Marshall, the
Town Board may (but does not have to) hold a public hearing. Either
way, the Board will then make a determination whether to grant the
permit, based on a whole host of factors, including safety, noise
and parking concerns, Town resources required, whether a charity
is the beneficiary of the event, and whether there is another event
nearby. The Board may specify the maximum number of people allowed.
The proposed new rules remain a work
in progress, in part because of objections expressed by the Elks
Club and the Greek Orthodox Church. Before their concerns are addressed,
it is worth noting certain proposed changes that do not seem to
be of concern. The most significant of these changes is the extension
of deadlines. The new deadlines would require applications be to
filed 120 days in advance of the event for events attended by 250
people or more and for events requiring road closures. For events
attended by 150-249 people without road closures, applications are
due 60 days in advance.
Another change that does not appear
to have raised objections would require applicants for certain large
gatherings to pay for police services. As indicated, under today’s
regimen, the Town Board has the discretion to require such payments.
The new rules would make the payments automatic.
The provision that appears to be
drawing the attention of (at the least) local charities concerns
the number of events an applicant may hold each year. Today’s
law contains no limitation. Ms. Graboski’s proposal would
limit an organization to three events per year and only one of those
events may take place at night. Charitable organizations would be
able to hold six events per year. Despite the additional number
of events afforded charities, the Elks Club finds this condition
worrisome, as it typically holds several events each year to raise
funds for the maintenance of its 17.5-acre property. Ms. Graboski
suggested that the rules would allow for exception in certain circumstances.
It has been suggested that the new
rules may contain a provision limiting the size of special events
to 500 people, including the staff on hand to run the event. While
such a rule seems unlikely, if this were to happen, the rule would
represent a seismic change in how charities raise funds during the
summer season. Among the must-go events, it is the rare one that
attracts fewer than 500 people. Shutting down large summer events
in the Hamptons would almost be like shutting down the Hamptons
itself. The top events would have to hold raffles to award tickets,
or perhaps just eliminate the $100 tickets that poor schleps like
this writer buy.
The Town Board will continue its
discussion of the new rules at its February 13 meeting.
|
|