| Issue #43, February 2, 2007 |
THREE LEGAL DECISIONS AFFECT EAST ENDERS
By Dan Rattiner
The wheels of justice turn
slowly, but they do turn. And during this past week, there were
three examples of how a legal wrong got to be a legal right. And
all of them involved the East End.
Perhaps the most outrageous of them
involved the case of a sick and dangerous man who, for several years,
assaulted women on the beaches in East Hampton, Southampton and
Quogue while wearing nothing but a ski mask. Why it took the police
three years to figure out how to arrest this man is another matter,
but the fact is that he was caught and he confessed to the assaults,
which were almost always of a sexual nature. It is estimated that
during three years he assaulted at least 23 women.
It took a year to bring him to trial
on one of the counts and he remained in jail as his lawyer tried
to work out a plea bargain. Finally, a month ago, the plea bargain
was announced. He would serve a 20-year prison sentence —
reduced probably to 13 if there was good behavior — and then
he would likely be deported back to his native Colombia. He is here
illegally. So that would be the end of that. As for the other charges,
they would be wrapped up within this decision.
But when this arrangement was brought
before the judge in the case in Riverhead last week, he did something
very unusual. He threw the plea bargain out. You’re not supposed
to do this when lawyers spend all this time working out a compromise.
(Otherwise, why plea bargain?) But he did. Writing that the arrangement
was not in the interest of justice, he demanded that the trial go
ahead. This man, if convicted, will likely spend the rest of his
life behind bars.

The second decision, which
seems to go a long way toward righting a wrong, involves the State
Bar Association of North Carolina. Two summers ago, we had working
for us here at Dan’s Papers, a college boy who was a member
of the Duke Lacrosse Team. Three members of this team, attending
a party, were subsequently accused of gang raping a woman at the
party who had, along with another woman, been hired for the evening
as a stripper. Our employee was at this party but was not one of
the ones charged.
Although the only evidence of this
crime came from the testimony of the stripper, a District Attorney
named Mike Nifong, up for re-election, held a press conference to
announce the indictment, claiming that the woman had identified
her attackers in a lineup and that DNA studies were being prepared
that would prove the accusations.
As a result of this, the three boys
were jailed, thrown out of school and the rest of the Lacrosse season
cancelled.
Two weeks ago, the case against the
boys began to come apart. Nifong, who had been re-elected largely
on the strength of his apparent diligent prosecution, was, at his
own request, being removed from the case.
Now, the North Carolina Bar Association
is moving in the direction of disbarring him. The lineup he had
arranged for the accuser consisted entirely of members of the Lacrosse
team. There was nobody else. So no matter who she identified, it
would have the effect of proving that the rape took place. Also,
at the time of Nifong’s press conference, he already knew
the results of the DNA test. The tests showed male DNA from several
men on her body, but none of it matched anyone from the Duke Lacrosse
Team. The event never happened. And though several other charges
remain, the rape charge has been dropped.
The third event in the news this
week involves two East End commercial airline pilots, who were involved
in a plane crash in Brazil. The men are Jan Paladino, 34, of Westhampton
Beach and Joe Lepore, 42, of Bay Shore, who were piloting a private
jet with four passengers aboard over the jungles of South America
last September. Seven miles up, its wingtip hit a Boeing 737 airliner
operated by the Brazil National Airlines Gol, sending it spinning
to the ground. The private jet landed safely with damage to its
wing. The crash of the Gol jetliner killed all 154 people on board.
After the crash, the two pilots were
relieved of their American passports and, without charges lodged
against them, told to stay in Brazil during the investigation of
the crash. They stayed at a hotel in Buenos Aires and were treated
well, but they were there three months. Only last month were they
finally allowed to go home, although they were told they might be
charged with homicide and that would require their return. Much
of Brazil, egged on by the press, seemed to think at the time, it
was the actions of these pilots that caused the crash. The planes
collided at 37,000 feet, the altitude allowed for the Boeing. The
transponder for the private jet, which displays the altitude, was
found to have not been on at the time the private jet landed, and
it had no record of ever being on during the flight. The press in
Brazil concluded that the pilots had turned it off.
The news last week was that homicide
charges would not be leveled at the pilots, but instead at the air
traffic controllers in Brazil who were responsible for the airspace
occupied by the two aircraft. Some of them are to be charged with
crimes that could result in 12 years in prison.
What has been found is that the controllers
on the ground were not looking at their screens during the minutes
before the crash or maybe even for hours before the crash. The private
jet pilots requested permission from them to go from 36,000 feet
to 37,000 in order to save fuel two hours before the crash, a request
often asked of controllers when there is little aircraft activity
about. This request was granted, even though the air traffic controllers
should have seen that to allow this would put the two planes on
a collision course.
As for the transponder, the controllers
were not receiving reports from it and should have noticed that
it was not working. Meanwhile, in the cockpit, though it wasn’t
issuing reports and was not keeping a record, the pilots report
that it WAS giving them altitude readings. That the transponder
could not perform some of its other functions could not be determined
by the pilots. To them it appeared to be working just fine.
In Brazil, investigators both from
Brazil and the U. S. continue to look at the transponder to see
how much of the unit was working and what kind of defects or faults
it had.
There could be negligence charges
prepared against the American pilots. But even if there were, since
both of these men were and still are military personnel on loan
to the jet charter, these charges would have to be forwarded to
the American Defense Department for final determination.
|
|