| Issue
#37, December 8th, 2006 |
Testing Air
By Dan Rattiner
Future Shock for Drunk Drivers
Marks a New Age for Drivers
Attitudes about drinking and
driving changed dramatically in the 1990s. At the beginning of that
decade, nearly 20,000 people died every year because of drunk drivers.
By the end of that decade, the number was down to 13,000. What made
it all happen were the new DWI laws. Drunks lose licenses. So when
you’ve had a few, give up your keys. It’s gotten into
the culture.
For the past five years, however,
the decline stopped. 2005s total was just about the same as it was
in 2000. And so people in government are trying to come up with
more creative ways to save lives. Their first success was something
called an ignition interlock.

This device is a sort of collar
affair that fits over an ignition key lock that will only allow
the driver to turn a key in the ignition if he can pass a Breathalyzer
test built into the device itself. It’s been in use now for
two years. Blow into a tiny tube, and if your alcohol level is under
the legal limit, the ignition key can be turned. If you fail, it
can’t be budged. So you stay where you are.
In nearly all states in the union,
a new law says that people who get convicted of a second DWI violation
are required to use the ignition interlock, which can be installed
by any car dealer. The restriction is clearly marked in big letters
on the offender’s driver’s license, so if a police officer
stops a driver who doesn’t have the ignition device that his
license says he is supposed to have, he can lose his license and
have his car impounded. Of course, none of this would prevent a
drunk from getting a friend who is sober to blow into the tube so
the car can be driven, even by the drunk. You can’t have everything.
Or can you? Maybe science can even fix THAT workaround.
And so scientists and lawmakers are
once again on the case. In New Mexico, lawmakers have passed a new
law that says just ONE DWI requires you to have the ignition device.
More states are shortly going to follow.
And scientists in Sweden, working
at Saab, are now working on a way to disable a car WITHOUT having
anybody blow into a tube. It involves shining a tiny light on the
forehead of a person who sits in the driver’s seat. Somehow,
the quality of the reflected light back tells you whether alcohol
is involved. And it cannot be defeated. Pull your hat down and your
car won’t start because it can’t get a reading. And
so forth and so on. Another group of scientists are working on alcohol
readings that can be discerned by touch. Put your hand on the steering
wheel and it gives a reading. These things should be on the market
within three years.
It’s amazing what electronic
devices can be installed into a car these days. Maybe the next thing
they can do for drunks is to brew up a cup of black coffee. Fail
the DWI test, and a cup pops down into a cup holder and fills up
with joe. You drink it down, and in thirty minutes you can try to
pass the DWI censor again.
And then I think we can go try to
tackle the motorist flatulence problem. Build these sniffers into
the car seats. They already have the heated seat problem figured
out. Put in sniffers, too, so when someone fires off a big one,
they get ejected, straight up five hundred feet to be parachuted
back down. Or better yet, flatulence is detected and all windows
and doors open and everybody is automatically ejected from the vehicle,
except for the flatulator. He gets to sit there, in whatever seat
he is occupying, soaking up all the odors, while the car, now on
cruise control, goes rolling along, doors banging, while all motorists
coming the other way laugh and point at him.
And so, everybody’s car gets
equipped with the automatic “flat eject” trigger. It’s
standard equipment. Right next to the sideview mirror wigglers (you
choose which ones and how much) and between the slap-you-sober button
and the fast food trans-fat detector.
|